Skip to Content

Debating (Ultra)Minor/Small and World Literatures in the Age of Cold War

«Back To Seminars

Organizer: Yanli HE

Co-Organizer: Iker Arranz

Contact the Seminar Organizers

This proposal aims to build a platform for regrouping "minor literature" (littérature mineure), "small literature" (kleine Literaturen & petite littérature) and "world literature" (Weltliteratur) contributions in the age of the Cold War (1947-1991) from three perspectives. First, it argues that some characteristics and concepts of "world literature" in the Cold War Age simply do not fit easily into the traditional categorization proposed by Goethe, Marx & Engels, H.M. Posnett or other scholars before Cold War. Second, in updating this terminological inquiry, the proposal is focused on relocating the new literary terms of Deleuze and Guattari's "minor literature" and Casanova's "small literature" back into the Cold War context, in order to challenge the French-centered axis and generally Western cultural bias of "minor and small literature". Third, it is also aimed at reconsidering the necessary and unmistakable borders between and within “minor/small & world literatures", along other extant and emergent configurations such as "socialist/capitalist", "political/artistic", "popular/elite" cultural systems, etc.

The list of tentative topics includes seven sub-topics related to (Ultra)Minor/Small and World Literatures in the Age of Cold War: (1) Soviet, (2) American, (3) Canadian, Latin & South American, (4) West European, (5) African, (6) Asian and (7) Oceanian. The main goal of this proposal is nothing more than the reinterpretation of the five continents' literary world under Cold War through the many neglected "literary spaces" between and beyond the counter-relationships of "North/South" and "West/East". In this endeavor, we focus on (but do not restrict ourselves) to three points of inquiry: 

How did the two super powers' cultural systems influence the differences of the "Northern/Southern" and "Western/Eastern" world literatures, e.g. UK vs. Oceanian, North vs. South American, European vs. Chinese literatures?

Where are the fissures in these dominating dichotomies involving the five continents' literatures, e.g. East vs. West Asian, North vs. South European literatures—as well as the distinctions within the same regional or national literatures, e.g. East vs. West German, North vs. South Korean/Vietnam literatures, ultraminor/small literatures in Soviet Union/States? 

What are the avenues for research on rethinking world literatures through (ultra)minor/small angles, and do these have the capacity to redefine and pair "minor & small literatures" that before, under and after Cold War Age, such that they obtain coherence among Del. & Gua. and Casanova's new terms—or even with Kafka's new literary continent before World War I?

Papers will be circulated at least one month before the conference in order to generate in-depth discussion of related publication plans during the seminar. For questions, please contact the seminar organizers: Yanli HE(yanlihe@scu.edu.cn) and Iker Arranz(iarranz@spanport.ucsb.edu)

«Back To Seminars